Anyway, check out Goldacre's article. It's wonderfully thorough and well-written. And remember, don't trust what you read in the papers. Labels: biology , quackery. No comments:. In this situation, when one calculates the average outcomes, it makes more sense to choose to steal. This outcome is reflected when played out, as it is more likely for one or both contestants to choose steal, with the most likely outcome being one steal and one split.
One curious episode of this show involved a very odd tactic, ending with a result that shocked everyone. On this episode, the two finalists, Ibrahim and Nick, began their discussion before choosing to split or steal.
Most often on the show, both contestants promise each other that they will choose split, whether that actually happens or not. However, Nick takes a different position. He tells Ibrahim that he is going to choose steal no matter what. This leaves Ibrahim with limited choices. Either he steals and neither of them get anything, or he chooses split, in which case Nick promises to split the money evenly with him after the show.
Ibrahim suggests that they both pick split instead, but Nick refuses. Individually, the worst decisions are start with self. Question 7. Individually, Steal-Split is the best and Split-Steal the worst. Pursuing their individual interests, players strongly prefer. Question 8.
Question 9. Because both prefer Steal, we can predict the final decisions will be. Question The worst decisions for BOTH players are. How much of the money, the man hoped to win? Persuade each other to move from Steal-Steal to Split-Split, players. A game theorist's advice would be. How can we trust that the other player won't cheat? The last round of the game pits the two best contestants against each other.
Report an issue.
0コメント